<< Back to Report Card
With the publication of the College Sustainability Report Card 2011, more than 1,100 school survey responses from over 300 institutions are now available online. In total, these surveys offer more than 10,000 pages of data collected from colleges and universities during the summer of 2010. To access surveys from other schools, go to the surveys section of the website. To see grades, or to access additional surveys submitted by this school, please click the "Back to Report Card" link at the beginning or end of the survey.
School name: University of Toronto
Date submitted: August 11, 2010
ADMINISTRATION
SUSTAINABILITY POLICIES
1) Does your school have its own formal sustainability policy and/or sustainability plan? Check all that apply.
[ ] No
[ ] Yes, a sustainability policy. Please describe and provide the URL below.
[X] Yes, a sustainability plan. Please describe and provide the URL below.
|
Description: The University’s Environmental Protection Policy recognizes the effects of the University’s operations, teaching and research on the environment, and provides a set of fundamental principles and specific objectives for minimizing this impact. The Environmental Protection Policy was first created in 1994, revised in April 2010. URL: http://www.governingcouncil.utoronto.ca/policies/enviro.htm(Please note that the updated policy might not be available at the above URL as yet; a copy of the updated policy in PDF format will be provided to Caroline Peri of the Endowment Institute)
|
2) Has the president of your institution signed any commitments related to environmental stewardship and/or greenhouse gas reductions? Check all that apply.
[ ] None
[ ] American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC)
[ ] Talloires Declaration
[X] Other. Please describe: Yes, "Ontario Universities Committed to a Greener World" - November 2009
3) Is there a sustainability component in your institution's master plan and/or strategic plan? Check all that apply.
[ ] No
[X] Yes, in the master plan. Please describe and provide the URL below.
[ ] Yes, in the strategic plan. Please describe and provide the URL below.
|
Description: The University of Toronto Master Plan, which is in the process of being updated, includes sustainability as one of seven over-arching planning principles. University and community support of this principle is enthusiastic and widespread. The master plan also documents in detail current practice and policy related to sustainability and the environment under the following headings: Environment, Sustainability, and Infrastructure; and is included with further specificity related to individual sites identified for development.
|
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEES
4) Does your school have any administrative councils, committees or task forces that advise on and/or implement sustainability policies and programs?
You may provide detailed information for up to three committees. If you have one advisory committee that is broken down into subcommittees, please indicate that you have one committee and answer the questions on the following page for the entire committee (the sum of data for all subcommittees).
|
Please provide the number of committees: Three committees
|
Committee I
5) Please provide the name of the committee and note the number of meetings held since August 2009.
|
Committee name: Sustainability Board
|
|
Number of meetings: 2 meetings (Jan, April)
|
6) Please provide the number of stakeholder representatives on the committee.
When providing the data on each stakeholder group, you should provide the total number across all subcommittees (you do not need to numerate individual tallies for subcommittees).
|
|
|
Number of representatives
|
|
Administrators
|
|
4
|
|
Faculty
|
|
3
|
|
Staff
|
|
7
|
|
Students
|
|
0
|
|
Other. Please describe.
|
|
|
7) Please provide the name of the chair(s) of the committee for the 2009-2010 academic year, and indicate which stakeholder group the chair(s) represents.
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Chair 1
|
|
Elizabeth Sisam, AVP Campus and Facilities Planning
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Chair 2
|
|
Ron Swail, AVP Facilities and Services
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Chair 3
|
|
|
|
|
8) To whom does the committee report?
[ ] President/Chancellor
[X] Vice President/Vice Chancellor
[ ] Other:
9) Please indicate the key issues/programs that the committee has addressed or implemented since August 2009. For each issue addressed, please indicate and describe progress made.
“Moderate” progress indicates that issues were discussed thoroughly and projects are in the early stages of planning. “Significant” progress indicates that new policies or programs were implemented, or are in the final stages of planning and approval.
|
|
|
Addressed
|
|
Progress
|
|
Description
|
|
Academics
Examples: minor, major and concentration programs, curricular additions, research projects
|
|
[X]
|
|
Moderate
|
|
The Sustainability Board has taken initial steps towards integrating sustainability into the research ethics approval process. The board has also begun an effort to lobby national research funding organizations to include considerations for energy and other operational costs of equipment into their grant calculations.
|
|
Administration
Examples: procurement policies, institution-wide sustainability policy, sustainability-related staff positions
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
The University’s Procurement Services has begun development of a comprehensive Sustainable Procurement Plan. The draft is expected to be complete in September 2010.Members of the Sustainability Board have been working actively with the division of Research Services in order to bring more accountability around energy and resource consumption into the research process. They are also connecting with national organizations (e.g. Canadian Association of University Business Officers), with the aim of working together to lobby the research councils to consider not only capital costs, but also operational costs in their policies on equipment funding.
|
|
Climate
Examples: draft climate action plan, greenhouse gas emissions inventory
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
The UofT Green House gas (GHG) inventory has been completed for the St. George campus by the use of Clean Air Cool Planet (CACP), prepared by third party, independent consultant (Honeywell). URL: http://www.fs.utoronto.ca/Assets/Facilities+Digital+Assets/sustainability/ghg.pdf?method=1
|
|
Endowment
Examples: proxy voting guidelines, investment advisory committees
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
University of Toronto has made significant progress with respect to addressing key issues/programs relating to the Endowment since August 2009. A Responsible Investing Committee has been established to provide a forum for interested parties of the University to discuss and express opinions on principles relating to responsible investing. From time to time the Committee will make recommendations to the University relating to principles of responsible investment to be considered by the Administration and University of Toronto Asset Management (UTAM). The committee, which reports to the Vice President, Business Affairs , is comprised of 9 members with representation from the administration, alumni, faculty, staff and students. The Committee has held 8 meetings since August of 2009. UTAM has initiated discussions with its Investment Managers on the topic of responsible investing and environmental , social and governance issues ( ESG) to understand how ESG issues are incorporated into their investment processes. Investment Managers for Public Market mandates manage the details of their proxy voting and they report on their proxy voting activities on behalf of UTAM on an annual basis. The appropriate use of University of Toronto’s proxy votes is important and if necessary, UTAM will on occasion provide specific proxy voting instructions to its Investment Managers. Proxy voting information is available to interested parties upon request. University of Toronto does not invest in shares of tobacco companies. UTAM is a member of the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance ( CCGG).This organization, which represents the interest of institutional investors, promotes good governance practices in Canadian public companies and the improvement of the regulatory environment to best align the interest of boards and management with those of their shareholders. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of Canadian capital markets is also a priority.
|
|
Energy
Examples: conservation/behavioral change programs, retrofits and efficiency improvements
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
Examples of improvements include: Exterior lighting retrofit replacing lamps with induction and LED lighting technology, thermal saving through re use of office air to fume hood exhaust, rescheduling building operation to better follow building occupancy, installation of a large solar thermal array at our Athletics Facility, Electrical Sub-metering Pilot Project, Garage Lighting retrofit c/w occupancy sensors and many more projects.
|
|
Food
Examples: policies to increase purchase of local/sustainably produced foods, implementing campus gardens
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Building
Examples: design or construction policy
|
|
[X]
|
|
Moderate
|
|
Buildings must meet Toronto Green Development Standard compulsory Tier 1 requirements (www.toronto.ca/environment/greendevelopment.htm). Currently identifying additional TGDS Tier 2 or LEED items to also be made mandatory by the University. To be approved through governance late 2010.
|
|
Student Involvement
Examples: speaker series, peer-to-peer residential sustainability education programs, student guide to sustainable living on campus
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
Sustainability Leadership Program: The Sustainability Office, Office of Student Life, and the University of Toronto Environmental Resource Network (UTERN) are developing a joint program that will give students the chance to learn and practice practical leadership skills in the context of effecting institutional sustainability. Students will be taught skills in negotiation, work-life balance, strategic planning so as to better prepare them for a career in the environment field or as an extra-curricular. The program is in development and will be launched in September 2010; Rewire: Using the centrally designed and implemented program, Rewire, as a springboard, students have come up with innovative ways of relating energy conservation messages to their peers. Some initiatives include lights out parties, a drying rack lending program, environmentally themed movie nights and inter-residence lights out competition during Earth Hour. See above for full description of Rewire.
|
|
Transportation
Examples: incentives for use of environmentally-preferable commuting options, campus fleet improvements, connecting students with public transit
|
|
[X]
|
|
Moderate
|
|
Bikechain is an organization that promotes cycling on campus. Bikechain runs workshops on how to fix bikes, advocates and promotes cyclist rights, holds events, and sponsors group rides, and offers a free bicycle program. Funded by the student body, Bikechain has served over 3,250 people since August 2009. Bikechain opened its doors in June 2006 and has seen considerable growth over the years. Facilities & Services purchased 14 bicycles for staff to use on our very large campus reducing vehicular traffic. The Department of Facilities Planning has also purchased several bikes for their staff to use to get around our campus.
|
|
Waste Reduction
Examples: recycling, composting, reducing consumption
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant progress made by F&S: Recycling Department distributed over 8000 reusable mugs, most during Orientation 2009, reducing the amounts of disposable coffee cups generated on campus. In 2009, we reduced paper cups by over 120K. The Recycling Department has also created new programs: (1) collect and recycle non-hazardous laboratory waste (plastics and glass) that is currently being landfilled; (2) collect food waste from kitchenettes on campus, and composted through our food waste program; (3) replaced over 100 stand alone garbage bins with recycling depots; (4) achieving a record waste diversion rate of 66.3% for the campus. / The Sustainability Office ran a pilot paper conservation program with Gerstein, one of the largest libraries on campus, and has saved over 80,000 sheets in the first 8 months. As of summer 2010, all the large libraries on campus are running paper conservation programs modeled after the pilot, and preventing an estimated 2-3 tonnes of paper waste from being produced annually. Telecommunications Services and the Sustainability Office ran an awareness campaign that reduced the number of phonebooks ordered by 50%, a reduction of 4-5 tonnes of waste this year. A team of engineering students developed an online “Swap Shop” for the campus, which will help departments and individuals to exchange furniture, office supplies, and any other materials they no longer need, preventing unnecessary disposal. The Swap Shop was pilot tested from January-March 2010 and is now being revised for broad launch.
|
|
Water
Examples: water conservation, reducing campus pollution, bottled water campaigns
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
(1) Significant water savings (19.5m US Gallons per year) were realized through retrofitting of several water cooled compressor units with air cooled systems. (2) We piloted water dispensing machines on campus to reduce bottled water use. (3) We also initiated a centralized irrigation system designed to control automatic irrigation based on the weather, installed 10 french wells, and replaced 3 hard surface pathways with permeable pavers across campus reducing surface runoff.
|
|
Other
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
Committee II
5b) Please provide the name of the committee and note the number of meetings held since August 2009.
|
Committee name: Sustainability Advisory Committee
|
|
Number of meetings: 2 meetings (Jan, April 2010)
|
6b) Please provide the number of stakeholder representatives on the committee.
When providing the data on each stakeholder group, you should provide the total number across all subcommittees (you do not need to numerate individual tallies for subcommittees).
|
|
|
Number of representatives
|
|
Administrators
|
|
1
|
|
Faculty
|
|
4
|
|
Staff
|
|
7
|
|
Students
|
|
4
|
|
Other. Please describe.
|
|
|
7b) Please provide the name of the chair(s) of the committee for the 2009-2010 academic year, and indicate which stakeholder group the chair(s) represents.
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Chair 1
|
|
Geoff Seaborn, Bursar, Trinity College in the University of Toronto
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Chair 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair 3
|
|
|
|
|
8b) To whom does the committee report?
[ ] President/Chancellor
[ ] Vice President/Vice Chancellor
[X] Other: University of Toronto Sustainability Office
9b) Please indicate the key issues/programs that the committee has addressed or implemented since August 2009. For each issue addressed, please indicate and describe progress made.
“Moderate” progress indicates that issues were discussed thoroughly and projects are in the early stages of planning. “Significant” progress indicates that new policies or programs were implemented, or are in the final stages of planning and approval.
|
|
|
Addressed
|
|
Progress
|
|
Description
|
|
Academics
Examples: minor, major and concentration programs, curricular additions, research projects
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration
Examples: procurement policies, institution-wide sustainability policy, sustainability-related staff positions
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Climate
Examples: draft climate action plan, greenhouse gas emissions inventory
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endowment
Examples: proxy voting guidelines, investment advisory committees
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Examples: conservation/behavioral change programs, retrofits and efficiency improvements
|
|
[X]
|
|
Moderate
|
|
Behaviour Change programs (Moderate): The Sustainability Office runs Rewire, a behaviour change program that reduces energy use in both residences and offices on campus. This program has been running on a yearly basis since 2006 and was active in 16 student residences on campus during the 09-10 academic year. While the program materials are designed centrally, the students are encouraged to build on the program by facilitating their own events and initiatives. Using Rewire as a springboard, students have come up with innovative ways of relating energy conservation messages to their peers. Some initiatives include lights out parties, a drying rack lending program, environmentally themed movie nights and inter-residence lights out competition during Earth Hour. The offices side of the project is going through a redesign to address difficulties with behaviour change persistence in office spaces. The redesign should finish by August 2010 and a revised program be implemented in October 2010. For more information please visit http://rewire.utoronto.ca
|
|
Food
Examples: policies to increase purchase of local/sustainably produced foods, implementing campus gardens
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Building
Examples: design or construction policy
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Involvement
Examples: speaker series, peer-to-peer residential sustainability education programs, student guide to sustainable living on campus
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
Sustainability Leadership Program: The Sustainability Office, Office of Student Life, and the University of Toronto Environmental Resource Network (UTERN) are developing a joint program that will give students the chance to learn and practice practical leadership skills in the context of effecting institutional sustainability. Students will be taught skills in negotiation, work-life balance, strategic planning so as to better prepare them for a career in the environment field or as an extra-curricular. The program is in development and will be launched in September 2010; Rewire: Using the centrally designed and implemented program, Rewire, as a springboard, students have come up with innovative ways of relating energy conservation messages to their peers. Some initiatives include lights out parties, a drying rack lending program, environmentally themed movie nights and inter-residence lights out competition during Earth Hour. See above for full description of Rewire.
|
|
Transportation
Examples: incentives for use of environmentally-preferable commuting options, campus fleet improvements, connecting students with public transit
|
|
[X]
|
|
Moderate
|
|
Bikechain is an organization that promotes cycling on campus. Bikechain runs workshops on how to fix bikes, advocates and promotes cyclist rights, holds events, and sponsors group rides, and offers a free bicycle program. Funded by the student body, Bikechain has served over 3,250 people since August 2009. Bikechain opened its doors in June 2006 and has seen considerable growth over the years.
|
|
Waste Reduction
Examples: recycling, composting, reducing consumption
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
The Sustainability Office ran a pilot paper conservation program with Gerstein, one of the largest libraries on campus, and has saved over 80,000 sheets in the first 8 months. As of summer 2010, all the large libraries on campus are running paper conservation programs modeled after the pilot, and preventing an estimated 2-3 tonnes of paper waste from being produced annually. Telecommunications Services and the Sustainability Office ran an awareness campaign that reduced the number of phonebooks ordered by 50%, a reduction of 4-5 tonnes of waste this year. A team of engineering students developed an online “Swap Shop” for the campus, which will help departments and individuals to exchange furniture, office supplies, and any other materials they no longer need, preventing unnecessary disposal. The Swap Shop was pilot tested from January-March 2010 and is now being revised for broad launch.
|
|
Water
Examples: water conservation, reducing campus pollution, bottled water campaigns
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
Committee III
5c) Please provide the name of the committee and note the number of meetings held since August 2009.
|
Committee name: Food Committee
|
|
Number of meetings: 1 meeting
|
6c) Please provide the number of stakeholder representatives on the committee.
When providing the data on each stakeholder group, you should provide the total number across all subcommittees (you do not need to numerate individual tallies for subcommittees).
|
|
|
Number of representatives
|
|
Administrators
|
|
2
|
|
Faculty
|
|
1
|
|
Staff
|
|
9
|
|
Students
|
|
2
|
|
Other. Please describe.
|
|
|
7c) Please provide the name of the chair(s) of the committee for the 2009-2010 academic year, and indicate which stakeholder group the chair(s) represents.
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Chair 1
|
|
Anne McDonald, Director of Ancillary Services
|
|
Staff
|
|
Chair 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair 3
|
|
|
|
|
8c) To whom does the committee report?
[ ] President/Chancellor
[X] Vice President/Vice Chancellor
[ ] Other:
9c) Please indicate the key issues/programs that the committee has addressed or implemented since August 2009. For each issue addressed, please indicate and describe progress made.
“Moderate” progress indicates that issues were discussed thoroughly and projects are in the early stages of planning. “Significant” progress indicates that new policies or programs were implemented, or are in the final stages of planning and approval.
|
|
|
Addressed
|
|
Progress
|
|
Description
|
|
Academics
Examples: minor, major and concentration programs, curricular additions, research projects
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration
Examples: procurement policies, institution-wide sustainability policy, sustainability-related staff positions
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
The Food Advisory Committee has begun work on a comprehensive food policy that integrates sustainability into many decision making mechanisms in the food procurement, distribution and sales, and waste disposal realms. Some of the considerations for the policy include more sustainable food sourcing, increasing consumer education on choosing products and disposal methods as well as reducing waste from the kitchen to the dining hall. The Food Policy is slated to be ready for approval late 2010.
|
|
Climate
Examples: draft climate action plan, greenhouse gas emissions inventory
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endowment
Examples: proxy voting guidelines, investment advisory committees
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Examples: conservation/behavioral change programs, retrofits and efficiency improvements
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food
Examples: policies to increase purchase of local/sustainably produced foods, implementing campus gardens
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
University of Toronto Food Services has two committees in place to offer feedback and advice on various initiatives. The Food Network is a committee of representatives from all food outlets on campus. The Food Advisory Committee is comprised of students, staff and faculty members who give constructive feedback and partake in the continual improvement of foodservices on campus. Ideas about new initiatives and feedback collected in the Food Advisory Committee are taken to the Food Network, which then implements the ideas and feedback accordingly. Thus, these two committees work in conjunction on various projects.During the 2009-2010 academic year, the two committees addressed or implemented the following programs: Lug a Mug: First discussed in the Food Advisory Committee, and taken on by the Food Network, the Lug a Mug campaign is now in its third year. To encourage the reduction of paper cup waste, foodservice outlets offer a discount of $0.25 for every beverage purchase in a reusable container. University of Toronto Food Services also implements information campaigns to educate the public about the negative environmental impact of disposable cups. In 2010, the committees approved the introduction, design and sale of reusable Lug a Mug cups on campus. These cups contain additional coupons and offers for discounts on beverages, in order to further encourage the public to use reusable cups. In 2009, 120,385 beverages were sold in reusable cups on campus. In 2010, the Lug a Mug program aims to save 200,000 cups from reaching landfills, and help our customers save $50,000 by lugging their mugs.U of T Water Initiative: In conjunction with Public Water Initiative, a student group working to promote public drinking water on campus, University of Toronto Food Services formed the U of T Water Initiative. Members of this initiative, including members of the Food Network, are working to eliminate the use of bottled water in their operations.University of Toronto Farmers’ Market: The Farmers’ Market on the St. George campus has been operating for three years. In 2009-2010, the market grew to include more farmers and vendors, and remained open from August to April. 2009 vendors included Cheese of Canada, The Cutting Veg, Kawartha Ecological Growers, St. John’s Bakery and ChocoSol. This year, the market is also welcoming Campus Agriculture (a student group that maintains several medicinal and season crop farms both on university property), and Campus Bee Initiative (a student group that has set up and monitors apiaries on rooftops of buildings on campus). The Food Advisory Committee is working with University of Toronto Food Services to promote the market.Local Food Plus: In addition to local food, Food Network operations on campus source certified local sustainable food. University of Toronto is one of the first institutions to be certified by Local Food Plus (LFP), an non-profit organization that connects local and sustainable farmers with institutions. The LFP farms University of Toronto sources from are all located within Southern Ontario. As LFP grows, so does University of Toronto’s sourcing of LFP certified food. In 2009-2010, University of Toronto Food Services purchased $332,441 worth of LFP certified food. The Food Network is currently working on ways to increase procurement from LFP certified farms. Seafood Watch: In 2009-2010, University of Toronto Food Services began to reduce or eliminate items from the “Avoid” sections in the Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch and Canada’s Seafood Guide. In the coming months, the Food Network plans to implement the Seafood Watch guidelines at more locations. Nutrition Week: The Food Advisory Committee raised the idea of a campus wide event focusing on nutritious choices and alternative diets (vegan, vegetarian, local, sustainable). As a result, the Food Network celebrated Nutrition Week in October 2009. This weeklong celebration included nutrition tips, healthy cooking classes, and different menus focusing on vegetarian and/or nutritious choices offered at discounted prices across campus; Earth Day: Earth Day is another celebration that was conceived by the Food Advisory Committee and implemented by the Food Network. Following Earth Hour in March 2009, foodservice operations celebrated Earth Day on campus. This celebration included tips on sustainable lifestyle choices, and a vegan menu at a discounted price offered across campus; The Green Team: Initially discussed by the Food Advisory Committee, the Green Team is an ongoing initiative on campus. University of Toronto Food Services employs students who form the “Green Team”, and work in cafeterias to encourage the public to compost organic waste, reuse or recycle other materials, and adopt more sustainable practices in everyday life; U-ComposT: Composting is another initiative implemented by the Food Network, and discussed by the Food Advisory Committee. Although foodservices have been composting back-of-house/pre-consumer food waste for several years, front-of-house/post-consumer composting was introduced in 2010. All of the major retail dining halls and residence dining halls have multiple compost receptacles installed alongside recycling receptacles and paper cup receptacles. Smaller operations have receptacles either in the dining hall, or on a different floor of the building. Trayless Initiatives: Due to the efforts of the Food Network, optional trayless dining is available in residence dining halls; while mandatory trayless dining is available at New College (Audrey Taylor Dining Hall), and all retail operations. In New College, the introduction of trayless dining helped reduce 140-200 lbs of food waste daily. Reusable Eco-Tray: The Food Network has approved reusable eco-trays in retail operations, and the Food Advisory Committee has helped form ideas on how to best implement this program. These reusable take-out containers will reduce and eventually eliminate the use of disposable take-out containers on campus. Starting in September, this program will allow customers to purchase their meal in the eco-tray, and return the tray at their convenience. This tray will then be washed and reused for a different order.
|
|
Green Building
Examples: design or construction policy
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Involvement
Examples: speaker series, peer-to-peer residential sustainability education programs, student guide to sustainable living on campus
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
Eat Local!: University of Toronto Food Services helped co-ordinate and participated in Eat Local!, a student-run event, to educate the community about the benefits of eating local foods, and how to change their diets to include more seasonal and local ingredients; Food Justice Unconference: University of Toronto Food Services is one of the committee members and co-organizers of the Food Justice Unconferences. These student-led events facilitate dialogue on issues related to food justice.
|
|
Transportation
Examples: incentives for use of environmentally-preferable commuting options, campus fleet improvements, connecting students with public transit
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waste Reduction
Examples: recycling, composting, reducing consumption
|
|
[X]
|
|
Significant
|
|
The Green Team: Initially discussed by the Food Advisory Committee, the Green Team is an ongoing initiative on campus. University of Toronto Food Services employs students who form the “Green Team”, and work in cafeterias to encourage the public to compost organic waste, reuse or recycle other materials, and adopt more sustainable practices in everyday life; U-ComposT: Composting is another initiative implemented by the Food Network, and discussed by the Food Advisory Committee. Although foodservices have been composting back-of-house/pre-consumer food waste for several years, front-of-house/post-consumer composting was introduced in 2010. All of the major retail dining halls and residence dining halls have multiple compost receptacles installed alongside recycling receptacles and paper cup receptacles. Smaller operations have receptacles either in the dining hall, or on a different floor of the building; Trayless Initiatives: Due to the efforts of the Food Network, optional trayless dining is available in residence dining halls; while mandatory trayless dining is available at New College (Audrey Taylor Dining Hall), and all retail operations. In New College, the introduction of trayless dining helped reduce 140-200 lbs of food waste daily; Reusable Eco-Tray: The Food Network has approved reusable eco-trays in retail operations, and the Food Advisory Committee has helped form ideas on how to best implement this program. These reusable take-out containers will reduce and eventually eliminate the use of disposable take-out containers on campus. Starting in September, this program will allow customers to purchase their meal in the eco-tray, and return the tray at their convenience. This tray will then be washed and reused for a different order; Eat Local!: University of Toronto Food Services helped co-ordinate and participated in Eat Local!, a student-run event, to educate the community about the benefits of eating local foods, and how to change their diets to include more seasonal and local ingredients; Food Justice Unconference: University of Toronto Food Services is one of the committee members and co-organizers of the Food Justice Unconferences. These student-led events facilitate dialogue on issues related to food justice.
|
|
Water
Examples: water conservation, reducing campus pollution, bottled water campaigns
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
|
OFFICE OR DEPARTMENT
10) Does your school have an office or department exclusively dedicated to furthering sustainability on campus? Please note: this does not include academic programs focused on sustainability.
Please provide the number of staff in the office in terms of full-time equivalent (FTE). FTE for a full-time staff member would be 1, FTE for a half-time staff member would be 0.5.
Please provide details below.
|
|
|
Office name:University of Toronto Sustainability Office
|
|
Year created:2004
|
|
Description:The University of Toronto Sustainability Office works to embed sustainability into the fabric of the St. George campus by linking research, teaching and institutional practice. The Office works with students, staff and faculty to develop and support projects, policies and initiatives that reduce consumption of resources while enhancing social engagement and inclusion. We foster partnerships among campus stakeholders and provide resources that will lead to meaningful change using approaches that link technology, behaviour and design. In this way, the Sustainability Office achieves tangible environmental, economic and social benefits while striving toward a culture of sustainability that is reflected in all the functions and operations of the university. The Sustainability Office works toward these goals in close partnership with the Department of Facilities & Services and various other university divisions, with additional external funding from numerous grants and private donors.
|
|
Number of staff in office (in FTE):6.5
|
SUSTAINABILITY STAFF
Please provide your answers to questions 11-12 in terms of full-time equivalent (FTE). For example, FTE for a half-time staff member would be 0.5.
11) Does your school employ a sustainability coordinator, director, or manager?
Your response may include faculty/staff who, in addition to their regular responsibilities, are overseeing campus sustainability initiatives (similar to the responsibilities of a full-time sustainability coordinator). For those faculty/staff partially assigned to sustainability work, please indicate time allotted for sustainability efforts in full-time equivalent (FTE).
Please provide details below.
Title:Manager of Sustainability Initiatives
Department:Facilities and Services
Time worked (in FTE):1FTE
Job description:The Manager is responsible for providing leadership and coordinating sustainability efforts with a goal of improving the environmental performance of the University - develops large conservation projects in areas such as energy management, transportation, procurement and recycling. Oversees energy reducing initiatives; acts as the University's Energy Conservation Officer. This position was first established in 1977 with the position “Energy Reduction Manager” and through this position, hundreds of energy reduction projects have been completed over the past 35 years.
12) Please list the titles and a brief job description for all other full- and part-time staff who are engaged in planning, implementing or managingsustainability initiatives on your campus (e.g. Assistant Sustainability Coordinator, Food Services Sustainability Coordinator, Green Office Program Manager).
Your response may include faculty/staff who, in addition to their regular responsibilities, are overseeing campus sustainability initiatives (similar to the responsibilities of a full-time sustainability coordinator). For those faculty/staff partially assigned to sustainability work, please indicate time allotted for sustainability efforts (in FTE).Your response may include graduate assistants.
Your response should exclude academic researchers, administrative assistants, technical support staff, and recycling/compost collections staff. Your response should also exclude information about undergraduate student interns and student employees. This information should be provided in the Student Involvement section of the survey (questions 56-61).
|
Title
|
|
Department
|
|
Time worked (in FTE)
|
|
Job description
|
|
Sustainability Director
|
|
Sustainability Office
|
|
0.33FTE
|
|
The Sustainability Director manages the Sustainability Office and its staff, raises funds for energy and resource conservation projects and collaborates with units throughout the St. George campus to foster a culture of sustainability at the University of Toronto. They also develop and maintain partnerships with internal and external organizations and institutions in the field of sustainable energy and resources.
|
|
Sustainability Coordinator
|
|
Sustainability Office
|
|
2FTE
|
|
The Sustainability Coordinators manage the Sustainability Office, St. George Campus. This work includes extensive research on available grants; coordinating budgeting and financial activities for the Sustainability Office as a whole; supervising and coordinating students’ work assignments in the office; creating and updating several technical and research databases; recruitment, orientation and administration of students for summer and part-time positions and; organizing outreach activities, workshops and press conferences. The incumbent is also responsible for arranging meetings, taking minutes; ensuring timely responses to requests/inquiries from the public, the media, City of Toronto, funding agencies and the University community and maintaining and updating the office files on a regular basis
|
|
Project Coordinators
|
|
Sustainability Office
|
|
4FTE
|
|
With overall responsibility to the Director, Sustainability Office, and working under the supervision of the Sustainability Coordinators, the Project Coordinators are responsible for providing critical support for energy and resource conservation projects. They supervise part-time work-study students (33 students during the 2009/10 academic year), in addition to coursework students.
|
|
Director Food Services & Executive Chef
|
|
Ancillary Services
|
|
10% FTE
|
|
Works under the direction of the Director of Ancillary Services to oversee the foodservices operations on campus. He ensures that the operators offer high quality and affordable services and products, and that their practices make optimal use of University facilities and environmental resources. He is committed to increasing sustainability in foodservices, and organizes monthly events and initiatives to raise awareness and increase a sense of community on campus.
|
|
Marketing and Communications Coordinator, Food Services, Ancillary Services
|
|
Ancillary Services
|
|
25% FTE
|
|
Assists the Director of Food Services in promoting and coordinating all foodservices related initiatives; trains volunteers (like the Green Team); design visuals for launches (like the U of T Water Initiative and Lug a Mug campaign); research ways to improve UofT programs and offerings; help coordinate the weekly Farmers' Market, and meet with student groups to brainstorm ideas and create events which highlight various sustainable or food justice topics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEBSITE
13) Does your school have a website detailing its sustainability initiatives?
If yes, please provide URL
|
http://sustainability.utoronto.ca/; http://www.fs.utoronto.ca/sustainability.htm; http://www.green.utoronto.ca/; http://www.utsu.ca/section/1110
|
GREEN PURCHASING
14) Does your school have a formal green purchasing policy?
If yes, please indicate the areas to which your policy pertains, and whether purchase is required or encouraged:
|
|
|
Required
|
|
Encouraged
|
|
Appliances
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Cleaning products
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Computers/electronics
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Lighting
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Office supplies
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Paper products
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Reduced packaging for purchases
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other. Please describe below.
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
Other description:While no policy is in place, we have guidelines that emphasize the purchase of products that are considered environmentally friendly and have not been tested on live animals in its product development. We are however, moving forward in the development of a green procurement strategy with collaborative input from the Greening Greater Toronto organizations and a research initiative on green procurement programs across colleges and universities in North America and the UK. We expect to have the strategy in place by early 2011. There are also some pilot programs in place with our copy paper suppliers to promote both FSC and recycled paper use. This has been rolled out at some of our divisions.
15) Please indicate in which categories you regularly purchase ENERGY STAR qualified products. Check all that apply. If possible, provide the percentage of products purchased that are ENERGY STAR qualified for each category.
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage purchased
|
|
Description
|
|
[X]
|
|
Appliances
|
|
unknown
|
|
It is an unwritten policy of University to encourage of purchasing Energy Star qualified product. Due to the complexity and the number of independent faculties no percentage could be established.
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Building products
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Computers/electronics
|
|
100%
|
|
We purchase 100% Energy Star for desktop computers
|
|
[X]
|
|
Heating and cooling
|
|
100%
|
|
all HVAC equipment is energy efficient
|
|
[X]
|
|
Lighting and fans
|
|
100%
|
|
we banned incandescent lamps in 2007
|
|
[X]
|
|
Plumbing
|
|
100%
|
|
all washroom fixtures are low flow
|
16) Does your school purchase environmentally preferable paper products (e.g., 100 percent post-consumer recycled content, certified by the Forest Stewardship Council)?
If yes, please provide details below.
For each of the items below, please indicate the percentage of purchases that contain post-consumer recycled content, are chlorine-free processed, and/or are Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified. Please provide approximate data, to the best of your ability, if your institution uses a decentralized purchasing structure.
|
|
|
Percentage
post-consumer
recycled content
|
|
Percentage
Forest Stewardship
Council certified
|
|
Percentage
chlorine-free
processed
|
|
Description
|
|
Envelopes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facial tissues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Napkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notepads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office paper
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
Many departments purchase recycled copy paper however, the purchase of office paper is highly decentralized. We have information about a few selected sites. Using the savings achieved through its paper conservation program, the Gerstein Science Information Centre has begun purchasing 100% post-consumer, which boasts both FSC and EcoLogo certifications and is processed chlorine free. This library is expected to purchase 2-3 hundred thousand sheets annually. Other major libraries are now expressing interest in purchasing more environmentally-friendly paper as well.
|
|
Paper towels
|
|
82%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
Purchases are all Green Seal certified and are manufactured from 100% recycled content, and up to 82% post-consumer or post-industrial recycled content. 100% chlorine-free processed.
|
|
Other. Please describe.
|
|
82%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
Purchases are all Green Seal certified and are manufactured from 100% recycled content, and up to 82% post-consumer or post-industrial recycled content. 100% chlorine-free processed.
|
|
Additional comments:Other: all Toilet tissue 82% post-consumer and 100% chlorine-free
|
17) Does your school purchase computers or electronics that are Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) certified?
If yes, please describe below.
Please indicate the portion of computer or electronics purchases that are EPEAT certified. Please provide the percentage of each product purchased that is EPEAT certified, where data are available. Note which products have been purchased in the “Product description” column (e.g., desktop computers, laptops).
|
|
|
Portion
EPEAT certified
|
|
Percentage
EPEAT certified
|
|
Product description (e.g. computers, printers)
|
|
Product 1
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
Our Tier one procurement agreement with Dell Canada specifies an Optiplex 780 as our standard desktop model. This model is EPEAT Gold certified.
|
|
Product 2
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
Dell: EnergyStar 5.0 rated power supply as the standard offering. The laptops are also either EPEAT silver or gold
|
|
Product 3
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
Apple Mac Pro and MacBook Pro are also EPEAT Gold certified.
|
FUNDING MECHANISMS
18) What mechanisms does your school use to fund sustainability projects on campus? Check and describe all that apply. If no specific mechanisms are in place, indicate as such and move on to question 19.
Data collected for this question is for informational purposes only and will not be evaluated for grading.
[ ] No specific mechanisms are in place.
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
[X]
|
|
Alumni green fund
|
|
The University of Toronto has three donation funds devoted to financing sustainability initiatives. Alumni have already donated more than $20000 since August 2009. The three donation funds allow alumni to donate to establishing a revolving fund for the university, supporting student internships at the Sustainability Office, or supporting the general activities of the Sustainability Office
|
|
[X]
|
|
Capital budget
|
|
The University is undertaking a number of major renovations and constructing a number of new buildings. Five of these projects will be LEED certified. The capital project budget for these projects will be paying for these sustainability features. Also, the Deferred Maintenance Fund provides capital dollars for major building repairs and retrofits. A significant portion of this annual $10M+ budget supports sustainable projects. For example, the University “Cool Roofing Standard” is funded through the Deferred Maintenance Budget. The roof standard employs high insulation values, very long life expectancy materials (with a 25 year unlimited warranty) and is highly reflective. In 2009, we spent $4M on roofing retrofits. Similarly, we have a “green carpet” specification and a washroom retrofit standard which emphasizes low flow fixtures and efficient lighting. We undertook several washroom and carpet replacement projects in 2009 funded by the Deferred Maintenance Capital Fund totaling approximately $500K.
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Endowment investment in on-campus sustainability projects
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Operating budget
|
|
The Facilities and Services Operating Budget routinely funds sustainability projects. In the past year, our exterior lighting retrofit, water reduction projects, and solar thermal array projects were funded out of the operating budget as were numerous other sustainable initiatives. Cumulative funding for these projects exceeded $500K last year.
|
|
[X]
|
|
Revolving loan fund for sustainability projects
|
|
While we do not have a typical “revolving fund”, the University of Toronto created a fund for energy conservation in 1990 with funding of $250K. This funding has been provided every year since 1990 and now stands at $500K annually.
|
|
[X]
|
|
Student green fee
|
|
BikeChain Levy: Bikechain receives a levy of 50 cents per undergraduate student per term. Half of the proceeds support the general activities of the shop which includes outreach and advocacy activities as well as expenditures for the repair shop. The other 25 cents supports the bike lending program. Graduate students recently approved a 50 cent per graduate student per semester levy that will go towards extending Bikechain’s services. The levy will go into effect in September 2010. / University of Toronto Environmental Resource Network (UTERN Levy): Receiving a levy of 25 cents per student per term, UTERN has a dual mandate of funding student environmental initiatives and connecting sustainability projects to related programs, interested students, and the campus as a whole. In accomplishing its first goal, UTERN has supported a range of student projects, including environmentally themed movie nights and speakers, student-lead urban agriculture projects, sustainable campus food options, and student delegations to UNFCCC conventions. Support often involves both a monetary and advisory component to aid less experienced groups with the logistics of event planning and publicity. In completing its second mandate, UTERN serves as an umbrella organization that networks groups together for the exchange of ideas and capacities to strengthen environmental engagement on campus. Through Environmental Working Group meetings that bring together representatives from a number of sustainably-focused student organizations, UTERN serves to unify U of T’s sustainability movement. For more information, please visit: www.utern.org
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other. Please describe.
|
|
|
EMPLOYEE OUTREACH OPPORTUNITIES
19) What programs does your school facilitate that encourage sustainable behavioral change among departments, offices, faculty and staff? Check all that apply.
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
[X]
|
|
Departmental sustainability liaisons
|
|
Sustainability Planning: The Sustainability Planning Initiative makes sustainability easy for units across campus by giving them a step-by-step process, and recommendations for cutting edge projects. This initiative sees Sustainability Office staff engaging with department- or faculty-level ‘green committees’ to facilitate the development and implementation of local sustainability plans. In 2009-2010, the Sustainability office worked with the following departments: (1) Faculty of Medicine Green Committee http://www.facmed.utoronto.ca/about/governance/green.htm; (2) Dalla Lana School of Public Health http://www.phs.utoronto.ca/Greening.asp; (3) Department of Family and Community Medicine http://dfcmgoesgreen.blogspot.com/; (4) Faculty of Physical Education and Health Sustainability Committee; (5) Faculty of Nursing Green Committee. / Rewire Offices: The Rewire Offices program uses community-based social marketing to encourage staff to adopt environmentally-friendly everyday workplace behaviours. Participating sites receive four monthly toolkits that target computer energy use, paper consumption, recycling/waste, and lights. / Paper Offices: The Paper Offices program offers sites a comprehensive paper reduction program that helps units to reduce their total consumption, as well as shift to more environmentally-friendly paper products. It incorporates both individual behaviour changes, such as paper reuse, as well as systematic changes, such as the setting of all printing defaults to double-siding.
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Green office certification program
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Green office tips posted online or on staff bulletin boards
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Incorporation of sustainability issues into new employee orientation
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Back to top
CLIMATE CHANGE & ENERGY
Please note: Unless otherwise indicated, when providing data about greenhouse gas emissions levels, please provide data based on scopes 1 & 2 emissions. Scope 1 emissions refer to GHG emissions directly resulting from sources owned or operated by the institution (e.g. on-campus combustion of fossil fuels, emissions from campus vehicles). Scope 2 emissions refer to emissions generated indirectly due to the production of electricity that the institution consumes. Scope 3 emissions refer to all other indirect emissions that result from activities of the institution (e.g. employee travel).
GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY
20)Has your school completed a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory?Please check all that apply.
The year the inventory was started (rather than ended) should be the year of the inventory. For example, if you began an inventory in June 2008, this would be your 2008 inventory.
[ ] No
[]In progress. Please describe status and provide estimated completion date:
[X] Yes. Please provide total annual GHG emissions (Scopes 1 & 2, as well as scopes 1, 2 & 3 in metric tons of CO2e). Include the start date for each year as well as the URL to each inventory, if available online, or attach the document.
|
|
|
Start Date
|
|
Emissions level
(Scopes 1 & 2)
|
|
Emissions level
(Scopes 1, 2 & 3)
|
|
URL
|
|
Notes
|
|
2009
|
|
May/April
|
|
138,462
|
|
164,490
|
|
http://www.fs.utoronto.ca/Assets/Facilities+Digital+Assets/sustainability/ghg.pdf?method=1
|
|
The UofT through its district heating and district electrical systems delivers thermal (steam) and electrical energy to other users/costumers. The emission contribution of these delivered energy are integral part of this report.
|
|
2008
|
|
May/April
|
|
133,726
|
|
159,269
|
|
http://www.fs.utoronto.ca/Assets/Facilities+Digital+Assets/sustainability/ghg.pdf?method=1
|
|
The UofT operates a Co-Generation, which increases local emission but reduces over-all emission due to its higher efficient energy utilization. (Co-Gen credit has been identified.)
|
|
2007
|
|
May/April
|
|
139,137
|
|
165,390
|
|
http://www.fs.utoronto.ca/Assets/Facilities+Digital+Assets/sustainability/ghg.pdf?method=1
|
|
The UofT operates tertiary (flue gas heat recovery) systems, achieving 95+% heat content removal. (Flue gas credit has been identified.)
|
|
2006
|
|
May/April
|
|
125,761
|
|
150,616
|
|
http://www.fs.utoronto.ca/Assets/Facilities+Digital+Assets/sustainability/ghg.pdf?method=1
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
May/April
|
|
127,075
|
|
151,688
|
|
http://www.fs.utoronto.ca/Assets/Facilities+Digital+Assets/sustainability/ghg.pdf?method=1
|
|
|
COMMITMENT TO GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION
21) Has your school made a commitment to reduce GHG emissions a specific amount by a target year?
The commitment should be to reducing actual campus greenhouse gas emissions, and does not include offsets or renewable energy credits (purchase of RECs is addressed in question 31). For example, if the university is committed to reaching carbon neutrality by 2030, and aims to do so by reducing campus emissions by 50 percent and buying offsets for the remaining 50 percent, you would indicate “50%” as the reduction level.
If yes, please list details below.
|
|
|
Reduction level (percentage):
|
|
Baseline year:
|
|
Baseline emissions level:
|
|
Target year:
|
|
Additional comments:The UofT Academic Plan (Toward 2030) has identified substantial GSM increase of the St. George campus. Most of these buildings will be science/laboratory facilities with major energy requirements for their research work. The University, however, through hundreds of conservation initiatives over the past 35 years, has avoided almost 1M tonnes of greenhouse gas. URL: http://www.fs.utoronto.ca/sustainability/reduced_carbon_footprint.htm
|
REALIZED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
22) Has your school achieved a reduction in GHG emissions? Answer should be based on scopes 1 & 2 emissions.
Please indicate whether your school has achieved actual reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. This does not include the purchase of carbon offsets or renewable energy credits. (Purchase of RECs is considered in question 31.)
If yes, please list details below.
|
|
|
Percentage reduced:23%
|
|
Baseline year:1973
|
|
Baseline emissions level:95,356 ton CO2e (using 2009 CO2 conversion multiplier)
|
|
Year achieved:36 years (between 1973 November & 2009 May)
|
|
Additional comments:Note: (1) The UofT started immediate action right after the OPEC oil price hike in November 1973. Since then the St. George campus grew 64% in GSM (from 659,059 to 1,081,334 M2) and student population grew 71% (from 26,028 to 44,441). (2) Due to ongoing sustainability/energy management projects since 1973, the electrical energy use per M2 only increased 8.8%, the thermal energy use per M2 decreased 25% and the water use per M2 decreased 61% since 1973. (3) See attached graph showing carbon emission avoidance due to sustainability/energy management projects since 1973 (709,684 tonCO2e)
|
23) Please provide GHG emissions figures in terms of gross square feet on campus for the past four years. Answers should be based on scopes 1 & 2 emissions.
Per-gross-square-foot emissions = Total CO2e in metric tons / Total maintained building space
The year the inventory was started (rather than ended) should be the year of the inventory. For example, if you began an inventory in June 2008, this would be your 2008 inventory.
|
|
|
|
|
2009:
|
|
0.0117
|
|
2008:
|
|
0.0113
|
|
2007:
|
|
0.0120
|
|
2006:
|
|
0.0109
|
|
2005:
|
|
0.0113
|
24) Please provide GHG emissions figures per full-time student equivalent for the past four years. Answers should be based on scopes 1 & 2 emissions.
Per full-time student equivalent emissions = Total CO2e in metric tons / Total number of full-time equivalent students.
The year the inventory was started (rather than ended) should be the year of the inventory. For example, if you began an inventory in June 2008, this would be your 2008 inventory.
|
|
|
|
|
2009:
|
|
2.942
|
|
2008:
|
|
2.953
|
|
2007:
|
|
3.091
|
|
2006:
|
|
2.844
|
|
2005:
|
|
2.875
|
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
25) Has your school achieved a reduction in building energy consumption compared to a 2005 baseline?
If yes, please list details below.
Data must be provided in terms of MBtus (one thousand British thermal units).
2005 baseline year
Building energy consumption:1,915,205,065
Gross square feet of building space:11,227,522
Performance year (most recent year for which data are available)
Building energy consumption:2,335,041,840
Gross square feet of building space: 11,790,852
26) Please indicate which programs or technologies your school has implemented to improve energy efficiency since 2000. Check all that apply.
[X] Cogeneration
[X] Temperature setbacks
[X] Steam trap systems
For the following technologies and programs, please indicate the percentage of possible campus building space in which they have been implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of building space
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Back pressure turbines
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Economizers
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Energy management system; building automation system, energy information system, or monitoring-based commissioning (MBCx) system
|
|
100%
|
|
[X]
|
|
Gas-fired hydronic heating systems
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Heat recovery systems
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
LED lighting
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Lighting sensors
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Metering—chilled water
|
|
100%
|
|
[X]
|
|
Metering—electric
|
|
100%
|
|
[X]
|
|
Metering—steam
|
|
100%
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other energy-efficient lighting (e.g. T5 or T8)
|
|
100%
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Performing system tune-ups
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Retrocommissioning of HVAC systems (buildings must have been commissioned, retrocommissioned or re-commissioned within the last 10 years)
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Steam turbines
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Steam-line insulation
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Timers for temperature control
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Variable speed drives
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Vending machine sensors
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other. Please describe below.
|
|
.
|
|
Description: Most of the identified energy efficient improvements were implemented well before 2000: (1) Co-Gen installed in: 1993; (2) Temperature set back since: 1980; (3) Annual ultrasonic steam trap inspection since: 1974; (4) Flue gas waste heat recovery (direct contact): 2000; (5) From T-12 to T-8 lighting retrofit Ph I (all 120, 208 & 347 volt systems): 1995; (6) From T-12 to T-8 lighting retrofit Ph II ( all 240 volt systems): 2007; (7) DDC based building atomization system since: 1977; (8) District heating system since 1914; (9) From oil to gas-fired conversion of the central steam plant in: 1964; (10) All buildings (120+) individually metered for electricity, thermal & water use since 1970; (11) Annual steam line inspection since 1970; (12) All major variable load motors (10Hp and up to 250Hp) were retrofitted with VSD by 1998; (13) Capacitor banks were installed on 13,800 volt electrical distribution system in 1992; (14) All water purification systems (steam operated distillers) were replaced with RO systems by 1996; (15) All free-flushing urinals (over 100systems) were equipped with motion activated water saving device in 1989
|
27) What programs does your school facilitate that encourage members of the campus community to reduce energy use? Check all that apply.
|
[ ]
|
|
Audits or investigations of individual energy use
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Cash incentives for energy reductions among departments
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Energy monitoring website or dashboard displays for buildings
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Energy reduction competitions among departments and/or offices
|
|
[X]
|
|
Fume hoods in science buildings
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Green IT policies (e.g. enabling power management)
|
|
[ ]
|
|
PR campaigns (increased/innovative signage, newsletters, slogans, saturation), demonstrations to raise awareness, pledge drives
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Trade-in or rebate programs for inefficient appliances (e.g. CFLs, refrigerators)
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other. Please describe: Yes - Fume hoods, PR campaigns, Rewire residences, rewire offices, sustainability planning, sustainability fund; Other: A major change in our budgeting model, where faculties are now charged for their operating costs, started in 2008, has significantly altered the academic departments’ understanding and interest in conservation of resources. Faculties are now aware of the energy they consume and from this knowledge has come interest and action on reducing these expenses.
|
RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION
28) Does your school generate renewable energy?
If yes, please provide details below.
Please check all types of renewable energy that are generated, and provide data on the percentage of your total energy consumption fulfilled by each renewable source listed. If less than one percent is fulfilled by a given source, leave percent box blank. For each type of renewable energy, please describe the production source.
|
|
|
Renewable
energy type
|
|
Percent of
total energy
consumption
|
|
Production
source description
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Biomass
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Concentrated solar power
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Geothermal (shallow depth)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Low-impact hydropower
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Photovoltaics
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Wind
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other. Please specify below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other description:Note: (1) Photovoltaic study of possible PV panel installation has been completed & presented to VP level; (2)Geo-thermal study of possible use at St. George campus is underway.
|
29) Does your school have solar hot water systems?
If yes, please specify number of systems and total MBtus generated annually, if available.
|
Number of systems:1
|
|
Total MBtus generated annually:711,040 Mbtu
|
RENEWABLE ENERGY PURCHASE
30) What is the fuel mix of electricity purchased from the grid for your campus? Please provide the percentage for each source.
If less than one percent of a source is purchased, leave the percent box blank.
|
Energy source
|
|
Percent of total energy purchase
|
|
Coal
|
|
18%
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
8%
|
|
Nuclear
|
|
52%
|
|
Petroleum
|
|
0%
|
|
Renewables (biomass, solar, wind, low-impact hydropower, photovoltaics, geothermal)
|
|
22%
|
|
Other. Please specify:
|
|
|
UofT perches its electrical need from Toronto Hydro. The province’s % of the electricity generation mix is changing day to day but on an annual base is as noted above. In the 2009/10 fiscal year the UofT generated 19.3% of its electrical need. So it purchased 80.7%
|
Percentage of overall electricity consumption purchased from the grid:80.7%
|
31) Has your school purchased electric energy from renewable sources or renewable energy credits (RECs)?
RECs and electricity from renewable sources must be Green-e Certified or meet the requirements of the Green-e standards.
If yes, please describe below.
Date of most recent purchase:
Length of contract:
Average annual quantity (kWh):
Average percentage of your total annual electric energy use that it represents:
ON-SITE COMBUSTION
32) Please provide total MBtus of energy for heating and cooling generated annually from on-site combustion:
1,529,813,000
33) Please list each fuel source used in on-site combustion for heating and cooling, and note the percentage of overall BTUs derived from that source:
If less than one percent of a source is purchased, leave the percent box blank.
|
Energy Source
|
|
Percent of overall BTUs
|
|
Biomass
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
|
Geothermal
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
100%
|
|
Petroleum
|
|
|
|
Other. Please specify:
|
|
|
UofT uses only natural gas for on-site combustion. This amounts to 100% energy use. Occasionally some #2 oil is used in case of gas use curtailment. 2009/10 fiscal year there was not any oil used. 40.4% of the natural gas use was combusted by the Co-gen system.
Back to top
FOOD & RECYCLING
Please note: The food portion of this category and information about waste reduction in dining services is covered in a separate dining survey.
WASTE REDUCTION
34) Please provide the following information pertaining to trends in waste generation per weighted campus user.
2005 baseline year
Weighted campus users:52,481
Total waste generated (garbage + recycling + compost):5,041
Performance year (most recent year for which data are available)
Weighted campus users:53,221
Total waste generated (garbage + recycling + compost):5,745
RECYCLING OF TRADITIONAL MATERIALS
35) Please indicate which traditional materials your institution recycles. Check all that apply.
|
[ ]
|
|
None
|
|
[X]
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
[X]
|
|
Cardboard
|
|
[X]
|
|
Glass
|
|
[X]
|
|
Paper
|
|
[X]
|
|
Plastics (all)
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Plastics (some)
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other. Please list: metal, wood, batteries, light bulbs, food waste/organics, furniture and supplies, paper towels, cartridges, rubber tires
|
36) Please indicate the campus-wide diversion rate of recyclable waste from traditional disposal.
The diversion rate should be calculated based on the diversion of traditional recyclables (paper, plastics, aluminum, cardboard, glass). Please do not include recycled electronic waste, recycled construction waste, or composted food and landscaping waste in the calculation of this figure.
The diversion rate is equal to the (total amount of traditional recycled materials) divided by the (total amount of landfill waste plus the total amount of traditional recycled materials).
RECYCLING OF ELECTRONIC WASTE
37) Does your institution have an electronics recycling program?
If yes, please provide details below.
Please indicate recycling of the following items is available for students (through receptacles on campus, recycling drives, or other means), and/or for institutional electronics waste. Check all that apply.
|
|
|
For waste generated by students
|
|
For waste generated by the institution
|
|
Batteries
|
|
[X]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Cell phones
|
|
[X]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Computers
|
|
[X]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Light bulbs
|
|
[ ]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Printer cartridges
|
|
[X]
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other E-waste. Please list items:
|
|
[X]
|
|
[X]
|
storage media (all magnetic tapes, CD & DVDs, etc); computer accessories (keyboards, mice/mouses, cords); computer components (printers, monitors, etc)
If possible, describe the organization and/or company you are using to collect your e-waste for recycling, and the environmental and social safeguards that they take in disposal:
|
We have 2 qualified contractors that recycle our e-waste: (1) Electronics Recycling Services; (2) GreenTec Recycling Services
|
COMPOSTING (APART FROM DINING FACILITIES)
38) What percentage of your campus's landscaping waste is composted or mulched?
39) Do you provide composting receptacles around campus in locations other than dining halls (e.g., in residence halls, offices, academic buildings)?
If yes, please provide details below.
|
[X]
|
|
Academic buildings
|
|
[X]
|
|
Offices
|
|
[X]
|
|
Outdoors
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Residence halls
|
Description:
|
Compost bins are found in many kitchenettes in UofT buildings, collecting food scraps, coffee grinds and tea bags; both academic and office buildings have these bins. Outdoor bins are found at the dining services but are accessible to students and staff; temporary bins are provided for events that offer food and biodegradable packaging.
|
SOURCE REDUCTION
40) Does your campus run any source-reduction initiatives (e.g., end-of-semester furniture or clothing swaps and collections)?
If yes, please check and describe all of the programs below that are in place at your institution:
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
[X]
|
|
Limited printing
|
|
Ground Services has been reusing every sheet of single-sided printed paper by printing on the clean side. / All central libraries recently set the defaults of their public printers to double-siding, and some libraries also offer a price incentive for double-sided printing. The Sustainability Office is working with instructors to reduce the use of course paper. The Office also offers paper conservation assistance to offices through its Rewire Offices and Paper Offices programs.
|
|
[X]
|
|
Move-in waste reduction
|
|
items not wanted are set aside and picked up for the Swap Shop or for recycling (depending on their condition)
|
|
[X]
|
|
Move-out waste reduction
|
|
items not wanted are set aside and picked up for the Swap Shop or for recycling (depending on their condition)
|
|
[X]
|
|
Year-round materials exchange programs
|
|
The Swap Shop has been operating since 1991 reusing University surplus equipment, furniture and supplies. The Swap Shop is open to all students, staff, and departments (departments have priority). Facilities and Services operate the Swap Shop, a space on campus where departments can deposit or acquire used furniture, office supplies, books and other items. To ease the burden on the physical Swap Shop and further promote reuse, the Sustainability Office has piloted an online Swap Shop, to facilitate direct exchange of materials between departments and individuals without an intermediary. It is now being revised for launch.
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other
|
|
pallets are encouraged to be picked up by contractors; lost and found items that are not claimed are taken to Swap Shop and reused; packaging is sent back to suppliers (e.g. cell packs, trays and flower pots back to nurseries)
|
Back to top
GREEN BUILDING
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
41) Does your school have a formal green building policy pertaining to design and construction for new buildings and major renovations?
If yes, please describe policy and provide URL to the full policy, if available:
|
However, our buildings must meet Toronto Green Development Standard compulsory Tier 1 requirements.
|
42) Please provide the following information about LEED-certified buildings on your campus:
|
Total number of LEED-certified buildings:2
|
|
|
|
Combined gross square footage:
|
|
Building name(s):
|
|
Certified-level
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver-level
|
|
108,000
|
|
UTM-HMALC
|
|
Gold-level
|
|
93,000
|
|
255 McCaul
|
|
Platinum-level
|
|
|
|
|
43) Please provide information about campus buildings that meet LEED certification criteria, but are not certified.
|
Total number of buildings that meet LEED criteria:info not available
|
|
|
|
Combined gross square footage:
|
|
Building name(s):
|
|
Certified-level criteria met, but not certified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver-level criteria met, but not certified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold-level criteria met, but not certified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum-level criteria met, but not certified
|
|
|
|
|
44) Please provide information about buildings that are ENERGY STAR labeled.
Total number of ENERGY STAR buildings:N/A
Combined gross square footage:
Building names:
45) Please provide information about buildings on your campus that meet the standards of other third-party green building certifications (e.g. Green Globes).
Certification type:N/A
Total number of buildings:
Combined gross square footage:
Building names:
46) For the 2009-2010 academic year, what percentage of your institution's non-hazardous construction and demolition waste was diverted from landfills?
ADAPTIVE REUSE
47) Please provide information about adaptive reuse projects your campus has completed since the year 2000.
|
Total number of adaptive reuse projects completed since the year 2000: 1 (255 McCaul)
|
Please provide additional details for up to ten of the most comprehensive projects:
|
Project name
|
|
Square footage
|
|
Former use
|
|
Current use
|
|
Additional details
|
|
Exam Centre
|
|
69,000
|
|
warehouse
|
|
exam halls
|
|
|
|
F&S/REO
|
|
24,000
|
|
warehouse
|
|
admin space
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48) Please provide the student enrollment and gross square footage of buildings on campus in the 2000-2001 academic year.
Student enrollment (FTE):35,501
Square footage:9,011,655
49) Please provide the student enrollment and gross square footage of buildings on campus for the 2009-2010 academic year.
Student enrollment (FTE):47,066
Square footage:12,597,530
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
50) Does your school have a formal green building policy specifically pertaining to operations and maintenance?
If yes, please describe policy and provide URL to the full policy, if available:
51) Please provide the following information about LEED-EB certified buildings on your campus:
Total number of LEED-EB certified buildings:0
Combined gross square footage:
Building names:
52) Please provide the following information about buildings that meet LEED-EB certification criteria but are not certified:
Total number of buildings that meet LEED-EB criteria but are not certified:0
Combined gross square footage:
Building names:
WATER MANAGEMENT
53) Has your institution reduced its water consumption per weighted campus user, as compared to a 2005 baseline?
Weighted campus users = (1 * number of on-campus residents) + (0.75 * number of non-residential or commuter full-time students, faculty and staff members) + (0.5 * number of non-residential or commuter part-time students, faculty, and staff members).
If yes, please provide the following information:
2005 baseline year
Weighted campus users:52,481
Water consumed (gallons):397,606,000 (GSM: 983,379; Student: 44,555; Staff & Faculty: 10,865)
Performance year (most recent year for which data are available)
Weighted campus users:53,221
Water consumed (gallons):384,055,000 (GSM: 1,081,334 (9.9%); Student:47,778(7.2%); Staff & Faculty: 12,825[18%])
54) Please indicate which of the following water-conservation technologies have been installed in existing buildings on campus. Check all that apply. For each item, please indicate the percentage of possible campus building space in which the technology has been installed.
For example, if dual-flush toilets have been installed in all bathrooms on campus, you would indicate “100” as the percentage of building space in which the technology has been installed.
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of building space
|
|
[X]
|
|
Building water metering
|
|
100%
|
|
[X]
|
|
Dual-flush toilets
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Gray water systems
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Laundry technology
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Leak detection and reduction
|
|
on some equipment
|
|
[X]
|
|
Low-flow faucets
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Low-flow showerheads
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Non-potable water usage
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Waterless urinals
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Xeriscaping
|
|
N/A
|
|
[X]
|
|
Weather-informed irrigation
|
|
N/A
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other. Please describe below.
|
|
|
|
Other description:Note: During the past 37 years the sustainability initiatives of the UofT resulted in reduction of water use by 61% per M2 and saved 13,169,704,000 Imp gallon or approximately 60 Billion liters. / Other: We have 3 naturalized areas on campus that do not use artificial irrigation. We do use weather-informed irrigation and will have a centralized irrigation system in place by September 2010. Other items are downspout disconnections directing stormwater into nearby gardens and french drains which collect and redistribute rain water underground.
|
55) What stormwater management technologies or strategies are used on your campus?
|
[X]
|
|
Living or vegetated roofs
|
|
[X]
|
|
Porous pavement
|
|
[X]
|
|
Retention ponds
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Stone swales
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Vegetated swales
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other. Please describe: porous pavements - 75% of all non-porous pathways have been replaced with porous materials (interlocking pavers); no retention ponds (West Nile virus and mosquito issues); stone swales - 1 feature on Philosophers walk using rain water, a rubber bed and recirculating pump; vegetated swales - all areas on the old Taddle Creek channel (Philosopher's Walk, Hart House Hill, Gerstein pavillion and CCBR plaza) are surrounded by vegetation on the hill slopes. Other: french drains (already mentioned), porous materials on pathways
|
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
Information concerning energy management will be drawn from question 26 (Climate Change & Energy). If you wish to provide any additional information about energy-efficiency technologies installed in campus buildings, please attach it in a supplemental document at the end of the survey.
Back to top
STUDENT INVOLVEMENT
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES
56) Please list sustainability-themed residential communities or housing options at your school.
A sustainability-themed residential community is created specifically to provide students with a living-and-learning experience focused on sustainability. Students must have actively selected or applied to live in the residence. Example: Synergy House at Colorado College.
For each sustainability-themed residential community, please provide the following information:
|
Name of program
|
|
Type of community
|
|
Number of students involved
|
|
Additional details
|
|
Victoria Environmental House
|
|
House
|
|
2
|
|
Students interested in the environment can elect to live in the Victoria Environmental House with like-minded individuals; http://www.vicu.utoronto.ca/Assets/Students/LLC.pdf?method=1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW STUDENT ORIENTATION
57) Does a portion of your new student orientation specifically cover sustainability?
If yes, please check and describe all ways in which sustainability is incorporated into new student orientation:
|
[ ]
|
|
Skits, speakers, or presentations that take place in large venues that most or all first-year students attend. Topics must include at least one of the following: promoting the Office of Sustainability, student campus sustainability groups, or sustainability as an important campus issue.
|
|
[X]
|
|
Incorporating sustainability information into presentations made by RAs to individual hallways.
|
|
[X]
|
|
Active engagement of students in activities that raise awareness about sustainability, highlight how sustainability occurs on campus, or in which students take part in a productive activity, such as volunteer work or projects (e.g., working in the on-campus garden).
|
|
[X]
|
|
Making orientation more sustainable through efforts such as a zero-waste meal or carbon offsets.
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other. Please describe:
Incorporating sustainability information into presentations made by RAs to individual hallways: Rewire is a CBSM campaign that operates in nearly all residences on campus. Sustainability information is disseminated to students at the beginning and throughout the year. Active engagement of students in activities…: Work-study and Rewire program recruitment as well as general awareness building by the Sustainability Office during orientation provides an opportunity for students to contribute hands-on toward campus sustainability. Environment week was held in September 2009. Throughout the week, there were numerous lectures and campus walks, as well as a Sustainability Office open house. During this week, many student environmental clubs held events to promote their projects and initiatives. Making orientation more sustainable…: Last year’s Clubs Day during the orientation week was bottle water free. A City of Toronto Water truck was on sight to provide clean tap water. Reusable mugs are now distributed in orientation kits to all incoming students along with a statement describing how green the campus is and where they can find more information on sustainability initiatives. Other: Student Family Housing and other residences hold a monthly orientation session for new residents which provide instruction/information on recycling, energy conservation and volunteer opportunities in the residence related to Sustainability. Reusable laundry bags and mugs are distributed in these sessions.
|
INTERNSHIPS/OUTREACH OPPORTUNITIES
58) Does your school offer on-campus, office-based sustainability internships or jobs for students during the academic year?
If yes, please provide the number of students and average number of hours worked weekly per student below.
|
|
|
Number of students:
|
|
Average hours worked weekly per student:
|
|
Paid positions
|
|
33 positions
|
|
10 hours per week per student (Work Study program)
|
|
Unpaid positions
|
|
8 positions (varies)
|
|
5 hours per week per student (Informal volunteer program)
|
59) Does your school have residence hall Eco-Reps or a similar program to promote behavioral change on campus?
If yes, please provide the URL to the program's website. If not, select “no.”
|
http://sustainability.utoronto.ca/projects/rewire.htm (There are lead coordinators and residence reps as part of the Rewire program)
|
Please provide the following details about the number of students involved in program, their average working hours, and any compensation that they receive.
|
|
|
Number of students:
|
|
Average hours worked weekly per student:
|
|
Paid positions.
|
|
2 (Rewire communications liaisons)
|
|
8 hours per week
|
|
Positions that award academic credit.
|
|
2-4 (varies year to year)
|
|
10 hours per week (typically)
|
|
Uncompensated positions.
|
|
65 (Rewire LCs and Reps)
|
|
2 hours per week
|
SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES AND COMPETITIONS
60) Does your school organize any sustainability challenges/competitions for your campus and/or with other colleges?
For each competition or challenge that is run on campus, please provide the details requested. You may provide detailed information for up to three competitions.
First Competition:
Competition Overview
|
Competition Name:
|
|
Year Initiated:
|
|
Website:
|
Frequency that competition is run:
Groups involved in coordinating the competition:
|
[ ]
|
|
Students
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Faculty
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Staff
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Administrators
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other, please describe.
|
Participants in the competition:
|
[ ]
|
|
Students
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Faculty
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Staff
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Administrators
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other, please describe:
|
Incentives for participation:
|
|
|
|
|
Describe:
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Non-monetary prizes
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Goals of competition:
|
|
|
|
|
Describe:
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Energy conservation
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Waste reduction
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Water conservation
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Percent of energy and/or resource use reduction resulting from the competition:
Lasting effects of competition:
Additional Information:
Second Competition:
Competition Overview
|
Competition Name:
|
|
Year Initiated:
|
|
Website:
|
Frequency that competition is run:
Groups involved in coordinating the competition:
|
[ ]
|
|
Students
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Faculty
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Staff
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Administrators
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other, please describe.
|
|
Participants in the competition:
|
[ ]
|
|
Students
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Faculty
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Staff
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Administrators
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other, describe:
|
Incentives for participation:
|
|
|
|
|
Describe:
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Non-monetary prizes
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Goals of competition:
|
|
|
|
|
Describe:
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Energy conservation
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Waste reduction
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Water conservation
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Percent of energy and/or resource use reduction resulting from the competition:
Lasting effects of competition:
Additional Information:
Third Competition:
Competition Overview
|
Competition Name:
|
|
Year Initiated:
|
|
Website:
|
Frequency that competition is run:
Groups involved in coordinating the competition:
|
[ ]
|
|
Students
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Faculty
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Staff
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Administrators
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other, please describe.
|
Participants in the competition:
|
[ ]
|
|
Students
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Faculty
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Staff
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Administrators
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other, describe:
|
Incentives for participation:
|
|
|
|
|
Describe:
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Non-monetary prizes
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Goals of competition:
|
|
|
Describe:
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Energy conservation
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Waste reduction
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Water conservation
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Percent of energy and/or resource use reduction resulting from the competition:
Lasting effects of competition:
Additional Information:
STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS
61) Does your school have active student-run organizations devoted to sustainability efforts on campus?
If yes, please provide names of organizations, a brief description of each, and URLs for the organizations’ websites, if available:
|
Name
|
|
Description
|
|
URL
|
|
University of Toronto Sustainability Commission
|
|
An arm of the University of Toronto Students’ Union devoted entirely to the advancement of sustainability on campus.
|
|
http://www.utsu.ca/section/56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Students Against Climate Change
|
|
Students Against Climate Change is a campus club that advocates for solutions to climate change.
|
|
http://studentsagainstclimatechange.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustainability Caucus (GSU): The Graduate Students’ Union
|
|
An arm of the University of Toronto Graduate Students’ Union devoted entirely to the advancement of sustainability on campus.
|
|
http://www.utgsu.ca/committees/sustainability.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Water Initiative
|
|
The Public Water Initiative is a group that advocates for sustainable, clean & publicly accessible water sources on campus, and is currently working towards a campus-wide ban on bottled water.
|
|
http://pwiutoronto.wordpress.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Green Majority
|
|
The Green Majority is a weekly, environmentally-themed, radio show on the university’s station that highlights sustainable subject matter from on and off campus.
|
|
http://besustainable.com/greenmajority/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
University of Toronto Environmental Resource Network (UTERN)
|
|
Receiving a student levy, UTERN acts as an umbrella organization to support individuals and organizations committed to a healthy environment.
|
|
www.utern.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U of T Campus Agriculture Project (UTCAP)
|
|
UTCAP is a collaborative group that brings together a variety of agriculture initiatives on campus, including rooftop gardens, ornamental vegetable gardens, and small-scale farming. It receives funding from a variety of avenues for summer staff that take care of pragmatic gardening and educational outreach campaigns.
|
|
http://www.harthouse.utoronto.ca/beta/html/events/utcap.php
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hot Yam!
|
|
This volunteer-run group serves up an entirely vegan, mostly local and organic weekly lunch. Their culinary talents have won the support of a variety of patrons and food critics while affordable prices make it accessible to all.
|
|
http://hotyam.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
University of Toronto Biology Environmental Action Team (UTBEAT)
|
|
This group works to engage students within the Department of Biology in topics and actions around environmental sustainability.
|
|
http://utbeat.biology.utoronto.ca/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Students’ Union ENSU
|
|
This group works to engage students in centre for Environment programs in topics and actions around environmental sustainability.
|
|
http://ensu.sa.utoronto.ca/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
University of Toronto Environmental Management Committee (EMC)
|
|
A club established through the Engineering Society, EMC focuses its attention on building professional skills for student environmental literacy at a facilities level.
|
|
http://emc.skule.ca/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U of T COP15
|
|
A unique group to the 2009-1010 school year, U of T COP15 formed to engage and inform the campus of the landmark UNFCCC conference in Copenhagen. The group consisted of a delegation that attended the convention and a supportive home team, two components that worked together to disseminate information and analysis on international climate negotiations.
|
|
URL: not available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trinity Environment Club
|
|
This group works to engage students within the Trinity College community in topics and actions around environmental sustainability.
|
|
URL: none available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodsworth Environment Team
|
|
This group works to engage students within the Woodsworth College community in topics and actions around environmental sustainability.
|
|
http://www.mywcsa.com/Content/WET.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
TRANSPORTATION
CAMPUS MOTOR FLEET
62) How many vehicles are in your institution's fleet?
The fleet includes all vehicles owned by the campus such as cars, trucks, and carts. It does not include lawnmowers or other off-road vehicles.
82 Vehicles
63) Please indicate which of the following alternative-fuel vehicles are included in your fleet. Check all that apply. Please list the number of vehicles for each class.
|
|
|
|
|
Number of vehicles
|
|
[ ]
|
|
100 percent electric
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Diesel-electric hybrid
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Fueled with B20 or higher biofuel for more than 6 months of the year
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Fueled with E85 or higher ethanol for more than 6 months of the year
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Gasoline-electric hybrid
|
|
4
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Hydrogen fueled
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Plug-in hybrid
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Other. Please describe:
Other: natural gas vehicles
|
|
4
|
COMMUTE MODAL SPLIT
64) What portion of the student body commutes via transportation methods other than single-occupancy vehicles (e.g., bicycle, walking, public transportation, carpool/vanpool)?
If data are available, please provide the percentage of students who commute by each of the following means.
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Bicycle
|
|
11%
|
|
Carpool/vanpool
|
|
4%
|
|
Public transit
|
|
66%
|
|
Single-occupancy vehicle
|
|
8%
|
|
Walking
|
|
11%
|
65) What percentage of employees commute via transportation methods other than single-occupancy vehicles (e.g., bicycle, walking, public transportation, carpool)?
If data are available, please provide the percentage of employees who commute by each of the following means.
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Bicycle
|
|
10%
|
|
Carpool/vanpool
|
|
7%
|
|
Public transit
|
|
39%
|
|
Single-occupancy vehicle
|
|
33%
|
|
Walking
|
|
11%
|
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES
66) Does your school offer incentives for carpooling to faculty, staff and/or students? Check all that apply, and describe below.
[X] No
[ ] Yes, to faculty and staff
[ ] Yes, to students
Please check and describe carpooling incentives provided for faculty/staff. Check all that apply.
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Carpool matching
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Financial remuneration
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Preferential parking
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Please check and describe carpooling incentives provided for students. Check all that apply.
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Carpool matching
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Financial remuneration
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Preferential parking
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Other
|
|
|
67) Does your school offer subsidies for the use of public transportation?
|
U of T offers a discounted transit pass for students, faculty and staff: http://www.utsu.ca/index.php/section/1078 Those who partake receive a discount of approximately 12% off the regular fare ($107/month instead of $121). All community members are eligible, but we are limited to 12,000 discounted passes per month.
|
|
|
|
Eligible community members:
|
|
Size of the discount (as a percent of full price)
|
|
[X]
|
|
Faculty
|
|
12%
|
|
[X]
|
|
Staff
|
|
12%
|
|
[X]
|
|
Students
|
|
12%
|
[ ]Check here if subsidy takes the form of pre-tax payroll deduction. Please describe below:
68) Does your school provide free transportation around campus?
|
If not applicable, please explain: Our campus is a high-density urban campus in the heart of downtown Toronto, and is entirely walkable.
|
69) Does your school operate a free transportation shuttle to local off-campus destinations?
|
If not applicable, please explain: The entire campus perimeter has abundant public transit options (buses, 2 subway lines, light rail transit, and streetcars) available to our campus community. Given that the campus in an urban area, there are few locations to which a free shuttle would be appropriate. However, a free shuttle bus runs between all hospitals in the University Health Network every 15 minutes from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. It operates every half hour from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 a.m. and from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. Furthermore, there is free and frequent shuttle service for University of Toronto Mississauga students, between the Mississauga and St. George campuses.
|
BICYCLE PROGRAM
70) Does your school offer a bicycle sharing/rental program?
If yes, please provide details below.
Year created:2007
Number of bikes available:30
Usage fee per hour:Free
Usage fee per day:Free
Annual membership fee for students:
Annual membership fee for faculty, staff, and administrators:
Other annual membership fee:
|
Description:Bikechain is an organization that promotes cycling on campus. Bikechain runs workshops on how to fix bikes, advocates and promotes cyclist rights, holds events, and sponsors group rides, and offers free bicycle sharing. The bicycle lending program is funded by the student body via a 25 cent levy per student per semester. Users pay a refundable $25 deposit when they receive the bicycle. Upon returning the bicycle, the student is refunded the $25. Facilities & Services Department (650 staff) have 14 bicycles available to staff members to get around campus and reduce car use on our massive campus (132 acres); free to all staff. Facilities Planning Department (30 staff) has 2 bicycles available to staff. Bike Chain - URL: http://bikechain.utoronto.ca/index.php/shop-information/rentals (more details on web)
|
71) Does your school offer bicycle repair services?
If yes, please provide details below:
Year created:2005
Service fee:No
Description:Bikechain is an organization that promotes cycling on campus. Bikechain runs workshops on how to fix bikes, advocates and promotes cyclist rights, holds events, and sponsors group rides, and offers free bicycle sharing. Funded by the student body via a levy, Bikechain has served over 3,250 people since August 2009. Bikechain opened its doors in June 2006 and has seen considerable growth over the years. The bicycle repair service is funded by the student body via a 25 cent levy per student per semester. Users get access to knowledgeable mechanics as well as tools and consumables for free. Replacement parts are available at low cost and a used parts bin is also available. This is an educational facility so users are expected to pick up skills so that they can one day perform the repair themselves. Bike chain - URL: http://bikechain.utoronto.ca/ (more details on web)
CAR SHARING PROGRAM
72) Does your school partner with a car-sharing program?
If yes, please provide details below.
Year created:2007
Total number of vehicles: 7 in 2009 but due to parking lot closures and construction there is only one vehicle in 2010
Number of hybrid vehicles:0
Usage fee per hour:$11.25
Usage fee per day:$88
Annual membership fee for students: $50
Annual membership fee for faculty, staff, and administrators: $50
Other annual membership fee: $30 (one-time application fee)
|
Description:Administered by Zipcar - see http://www.zipcar.comZIP CAR has many "extra value plans" that lower your costs, see website http://www.zipcar.com/toronto/learn-more?plan_key=evp-50
|
PLANNING
73) Does your school have policies that support a pedestrian-friendly or bike-friendly campus (e.g., in the school's master plan, a policy prohibiting vehicles from the center of campus)?
|
(Master Plan) The University of Toronto supports a pedestrian and bicycle-friendly campus through standards and planning documents. The current master plan identifies policy and current practice related to cycling and the pedestrian environment primarily under: Circulation, Open Space, and Personal Safety & Security. The plan references ‘Investing in the Landscape’ (Open Space Master Plan), which identifies “Pedestrian Priority Zones”. Pedestrianization projects identified in this document continue to be implemented on campus. / The University of Toronto Area Secondary Plan Zoning by-law requires, “not less than 850 bicycle parking spaces to serve buildings and structures used by the University of Toronto for university purposes wihtin the University of Toronto Area.” Further, the University’s Landscape Design Standards include minimum requirements for well-located, secure bicycle storage as part of all new building and addition projects; the Design Standards also reflect the desire for an enhanced pedestrian environment with specific requirements related to site furnishings, lighting and paving material. / Most recently, the University has committed to the Walking Strategy, a pilot project funded by the City of Toronto. The Walking Strategy, which converts vehicular streets into pedestrian open space in two locations, will be implemented by the 2010 fall semester.
|
74) Do you offer the option of a condensed work week or telecommuting to at least ten percent of full-time employees? For each option, please indicate who is eligible.
|
|
|
|
|
Employees eligible
|
|
Description:
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Telecommuting
|
|
|
|
Facilities & Services have a pilot program
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Condensed work week
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments:Facilities & Services have a pilot telecommuting program started in 2009
|
Back to top
STATISTICS
75) Campus setting:
76) Total number of buildings on campus:
|
125 (St. George Campus excluding Federated Colleges)
|
77) Combined gross square footage of all buildings on campus:
78) Full-time enrollment (undergraduate + graduate, headcount at start of academic year):
79) Part-time enrollment (undergraduate + graduate, headcount at start of academic year):
80) Percent of full-time students that live on campus:
OTHER AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGAGEMENT
Question 81 is for informational purposes only; responses will NOT be included in the Report Card evaluation process.
81) Please check all items that apply to your institution:
|
|
|
|
|
Description (optional)
|
|
[X]
|
|
Campus garden or farm
|
|
Hart House Farm and a number of campus urban agriculture projects including rooftop gardening on the Galbraith building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Disposable water bottle ban
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Environmental science/studies major (undergraduate-level)
|
|
Offered by the Centre for Environment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Environmental science/studies minor or concentration (undergraduate-level)
|
|
Offered by the Centre for Environment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Graduate-level environmental studies program (graduate-level)
|
|
Offered by the Centre for Environment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Graduate-level sustainability studies program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Outdoors club
|
|
University of Toronto Outing Club
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Participation in Recyclemania
|
|
Not recyclemania but we participate in the City of Toronto's annual "20 minute Toronto Make-over" event
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Single-stream recycling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Student trustee position
|
|
There are student representatives on the University of Toronto Board of Governors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Sustainability major, minor or concentration (undergraduate-level)
|
|
|
Back to top
<< Back to Report Card